A Framework for Evaluating Private Market Funds

A Fiduciary’s Framework

How to calculate the all-in cost of a private-market fund across every fund type, share class, and distribution channel — before you recommend it.

If you sit across from clients as a fiduciary, you already know the hardest question in private markets is not “is this a good fund?” It is “what does this actually cost my client, all in, once every hand in the chain has been paid?” Private-market products are engineered to lead with their smallest number. A fund can advertise a 0.10% management fee and still cost a client more than 3% a year before a dollar of performance fee is counted. The gap between the headline and the reality is where fiduciary risk lives.

This paper gives you a repeatable way to close that gap. It breaks any private-market fund into four cost layers, shows how those layers change depending on whether you access the fund directly or through an alternative-investment platform, and maps the differences across the four registered structures you will actually encounter — closed-end funds, interval funds, business development companies (BDCs), and tender-offer funds — plus the broker and advisory share classes stacked inside them. Every fee figure is drawn from public filings and disclosures, with sources cited, so you can pressure-test your own products against real numbers.

Fees are the one thing in investing you know in advance with certainty. Returns are a hope; costs are a contract. When a product leads with the smallest number in a stack of five, that choice tells you where they would rather you look.

A plain truism runs underneath all of this: you don’t get paid for the risk you take, you get paid for the risk you understand. The same is true of cost. An advisor who can decompose a fund’s fee stack from memory is an advisor who can look a client in the eye and explain exactly why a given fund earned its place — or why it did not.

Compliance note. All fee figures below are illustrative, sourced from third-party public filings and disclosures as of the dates cited (mid-2026). They are provided for educational purposes, are not a recommendation of any named fund, and should be independently verified against each fund’s current prospectus, Form N-2, or private placement memorandum before use with clients. Named-fund figures should be routed through internal compliance review prior to any external distribution.

What You Will Gain from This Framework

  • A four-layer cost model you can apply to any private-market fund, regardless of wrapper.
  • A side-by-side map of listed closed-end funds, interval funds, non-traded BDCs, and tender-offer funds, including how each delivers liquidity.
  • A clear view of what direct placement, platform feeders, and share classes each add to a client’s all-in cost.
  • A seven-question worksheet your team can run before recommending any private-market fund.

‍

Advisor Access

Continue Reading in Intelligence

The full version of this insight is available in BIP Capital Intelligence, our research library for registered investment advisers and qualified firm personnel.

Access is free and requests are reviewed within 1-3 business days.

Already registered?
Login here

Related Insights